Anant Ram Reeta Lata Ram Sangeeta Ram Reena Ram Nazra Bibi Ram v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

46 F.3d 1144 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Anant RAM; Reeta Lata Ram; Sangeeta Ram; Reena Ram; Nazra Bibi Ram, Petitioners, v. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 93-70596. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted: Dec. 15, 1994. * Decided: Jan. 12, 1995. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, PREGERSON and BEEZER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Anant Ram, Nazra Bibi Ram and their three children ("the Rams"), ethnic Indian citizens of Fiji, petition for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("Board") upholding the Immigration Judge's ("IJ") denial of their application for asylum and withholding of deportation. The Board concluded that the Rams failed to demonstrate past persecution or a well-founded fear of persecution on account of race or political opinion. We have jurisdiction over this timely petition pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1105a(a). We deny the petition. 1 3 * Section 208(a) of the Immigration and…