Ray Donald Pratt v. Charles Ryan

46 F.3d 1144 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ray Donald PRATT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Charles RYAN, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-15980. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted: Jan. 25, 1995. * Decided: Feb. 3, 1995. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HALL and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ray Donald Pratt, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment for defendants and the denial of Pratt's Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend the judgment in Pratt's 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action against Charles Ryan, Warden of the Arizona State Prison Complex in Winslow, Arizona (ASPC-Winslow), and correctional officers C.E. Good and J. French. Pratt alleged that inadequate lighting conditions in a cell he occupied in the ASPC-Winslow Complex Detention Unit violated his rights under the Eighth Amendment. 3 We have jursidiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm for the reasons…