David C. Roberts, Sri v. Motion Picture Pension Plan Blankenship Administrator

46 F.3d 1144 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. David C. ROBERTS, Sri, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MOTION PICTURE PENSION PLAN; Blankenship Administrator, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-55587. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted: Jan. 25, 1995. * Decided: Feb. 1, 1995. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HALL and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Sri David C. Roberts appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of the Motion Picture Industry Pension Plan and plan administrator Harley Blankenship (collectively the "Pension Plan") in Roberts's action in which he alleged that the Pension Plan had improperly converted his pension benefits when it honored an Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") levy against Roberts's pension benefits. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 * Background 4 Roberts, a self described sovereign white citizen of the Republic of California, brought an action in California…