Gary Levone Piper v. United States Marshal, Antoine Joseph Porterfield v. United States Marshal

Good Law
46 F.3d 1144·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 7296
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 12, 199593-56694California543 words

Opinion

Opinion

46 F.3d 1144 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Gary Levone PIPER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES MARSHAL, Respondent-Appellee. Antoine Joseph PORTERFIELD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES MARSHAL, Respondent-Appellee. Nos. 93-56694, 93-56697. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted: Dec. 7, 1994. Decided: Jan. 12, 1995. Before: SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 The only issue properly before us is the correctness of the United States Magistrate Judge's amended order of extradition. The amendment was made after this court remanded to the district court 3 with instructions to grant the petitions for habeas corpus unless, within 60 days, the extradition magistrate amends the certification of extradition to provide that Piper and Porterfield are extraditable to face prosecution under Canadian Criminal Code Sec. 271 only for conduct that is felonious under California law. 4 Piper v. U.S.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.