Edward J. Schuler v. Secretary of Health & Human Services

Good Law
46 F.3d 1145·1995 WL 41400·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 7347
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 1, 199594-15743California771 words

Opinion

Opinion

46 F.3d 1145 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Edward J. SCHULER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-15743. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted: Jan. 25, 1995. * Decided: Feb. 1, 1995. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HALL and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Edward J. Schuler appeals pro se the district court's denial of his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration. Schuler contends that the district court should have granted his motion for a new trial or amended its judgment in his action challenging the Secretary of Health and Human Services's ("Secretary") denial of disability benefits under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 405 (g). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 * Background 4 Schuler appealed from the district court's underlying decision to this court on December 3, 1992. In Schuler v. Shalala, No. 92-17091, unpublished…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.