Melvin Schneider v. The Boeing Company

46 F.3d 1145 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Melvin SCHNEIDER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The BOEING COMPANY; et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-35115. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted: Dec. 19, 1994. * Decided: Jan. 6, 1995. Before: SNEED, D.W. NELSON and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Melvin Schneider appeals pro se the district court's dismissal based on res judicata of his action against The Boeing Company ("Boeing") and others arising out of Schneider's employment with Boeing. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and affirm. 3 We review de novo the district court's determination that an action is barred by the doctrine of res judicata. Robi v. Five Platters, Inc., 838 F.2d 318, 321 (9th Cir. 1988). 4 The doctrine of res judicata encompasses the doctrines of issue preclusion and claim preclusion. Id. "Claim preclusion treats a judgment, once rendered, as the full measure of relief to be accorded between…