In Re Barbara J. Turner, Debtor John Boldt Barbara Runser v. Barbara J. Turner

Good Law
46 F.3d 1145·1995 WL 41398·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 7348
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 1, 199594-15675California743 words

Opinion

Opinion

46 F.3d 1145 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re Barbara J. TURNER, Debtor John BOLDT; Barbara Runser, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Barbara J. TURNER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-15675. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted: Jan. 25, 1995. * Decided: Feb. 1, 1995. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HALL and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Barbara J. Turner appeals pro se the district court's dismissal, on mootness grounds, of her appeal from a bankruptcy court order denying her motion for a homestead exemption on certain realty. Turner contends that the foreclosure and sale of the realty in question did not render her motion for a homestead exemption moot. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 158 (d), and we affirm. 3 We review de novo a district court's decision on subject-matter jurisdiction, including questions of mootness. Sample v. Johnson, 771 F.2d 1335, 1338 (9th Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1019 (1986). In…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.