Staar Surgical Company, Inc., Plaintiff/counter-Defendant/appellant v. Allergan Medical Optics Allergan Inc., Defendants/counter-Claimants/appellees

46 F.3d 1145 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. STAAR SURGICAL COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant/Appellant, v. ALLERGAN MEDICAL OPTICS; Allergan Inc., Defendants/Counter-Claimants/Appellees. No. 93-55857. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted: Dec. 5, 1994. Decided: Jan. 19, 1995. Before: SCHROEDER, FLETCHER and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Staar Surgical Company, Inc. (Staar) appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Allergan Medical Optics and Allergan, Inc. (Allergan). We have jurisdiction over this timely appeal under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We review de novo, Jessinger v. Nevada Federal Credit Union, 24 F.3d 1127, 1130 (9th Cir. 1994), and affirm. 3 Staar seeks to rescind a contract negotiated as part of a settlement agreement. All of Staar's claims hinge on successful rescission of the contract. The parties agree California law governs this dispute. Because we conclude Staar…