John Schaefers v. Gary Wright George Burke City of Forest Grove, an Oregon Municipal Corporation

46 F.3d 1145 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. John SCHAEFERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gary WRIGHT; George Burke; City of Forest Grove, an Oregon Municipal Corporation, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-35492. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted: Jan. 11, 1995. * Decided: Jan. 20, 1995. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HALL and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 John Schaefers appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the City of Forest Grove and various Forest Grove police officers in his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action. In his complaint, Schaefers alleged that the defendants violated his fourth amendment rights by arresting him in his home without an arrest warrant. The district court found that the officers were entitled to qualified immunity. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 On appeal Schaefers contends that (1) the district court improperly granted summary judgment in favor of…