Jimmie Stephen v. Mary Zulfacar, Dr.

46 F.3d 1145 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jimmie STEPHEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mary ZULFACAR, Dr., Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-55626. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 19, 1994. * Decided Jan. 11, 1995. Appeal from the United States District Court, for the Southern District of California, D.C. No. CV-92-01216-JSR; John S. Rhoades, District Judge, Presiding. S.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before: SNEED, D.W. NELSON, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jimmie Stephen, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of prison doctor Mary Zulfacar in his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action alleging deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We review de novo a district court's grant of summary judgment, see Kruso v. International Tel. & Tel. Corp., 872 F.2d 1416 , 1421 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 937 (1990), and we…