Stamford Hotel, a Texas Limited Partnership, by Its Managing General Partner, Csh-Stamford Hotel Limited Partnership, a Texas Limited Partnership 42nd West 48th Street Limited Partnership, a Texas Limited Partnership, by Its Managing General Partner, Csh-48th Street Limited Partnership, a Texas Limited Partnership 400 Madison Avenue Limited Partnership, a Texas Limited Partnership, by Its Managing General Partner, Csh-Madison Avenue Limited Partnership, a Delaware Limited Partnership v. Prudential Securities, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Prudential Securities Group, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Prudential-Bache Properties, Inc., a Delaware Corporation

Good Law
46 F.3d 1145·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 7319
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 13, 199593-55802California286 words

Opinion

Opinion

46 F.3d 1145 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. STAMFORD HOTEL, a Texas limited partnership, by its managing general partner, CSH-STAMFORD HOTEL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Texas limited partnership; 42nd West 48th Street Limited Partnership, a Texas limited partnership, by its managing general partner, CSH-48th Street Limited Partnership, a Texas limited partnership; 400 Madison Avenue Limited Partnership, a Texas limited partnership, by its managing general partner, Csh-Madison Avenue Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. PRUDENTIAL SECURITIES, INC., a Delaware corporation; Prudential Securities Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation; Prudential-Bache Properties, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 93-55802, 93-55804 and 93-55806. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted: Oct. 6, 1994. * Decided: Jan. 13, 1995. Before: D.W. NELSON, NORRIS, and BOGGS ** , Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM *** 2…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.