Harry James Seagrave v. James K. Rowland

46 F.3d 1145 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Harry James SEAGRAVE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James K. ROWLAND, et. al., Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-15041. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted: Jan. 11, 1995. * Decided: Jan. 27, 1995. Before: ALDISERT ** , GOODWIN and SCHROEDER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM *** 2 Harry James Seagrave appeals from the district court's denial of his motion for a preliminary injunction in his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action, alleging deprivation of his right of access to the courts in violation of the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments. Jurisdiction was proper in the district court under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1343 . We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1292 (a)(1). We affirm. I. 3 Seagrave contends that California's "zero indigency" rule forces him to choose between obtaining access to the courts and obtaining other items, in particular, "ordinary hygiene" supplies. The California Code of Regulations provides that…