State of Ariz. v. Mabson

Good Law
46 F.3d 1145·1995 WL 21236·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 7323
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 19, 199593-10742California556 words

Opinion

Opinion

46 F.3d 1145 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. The STATE OF ARIZONA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John L. MABSON; Defendant-Appellant, E-Z8 Motels, Inc., Florence Ammon, Manager, engaged in Interstate Commerce pursuant to Title II Secs. 201(a)(b)(c)(d), 202, Civil Rights Act of 1964 as amended, Real Party in Interest. No. 93-10742. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted: Jan. 11, 1995. * Decided: Jan. 19, 1995. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HALL and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 John L. Mabson appeals pro se the district court's order remanding a state prosecution for criminal trespass to state court following Mabson's petition of removal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1443 . We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Secs. 1291 , 1447(d). Ferrari, Alravez, Olsen & Ottoboni v. Home Ins. Co., 940 F.2d 550, 553-55 (9th Cir. 1991). We review de novo, Westinghouse Elec. Corp. v. Newman & Holtzinger, P.C., 992 F.2d 932, 934 (9th Cir.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.