James H. Sanders v. Philip Gilbert, Personally Mitchell, Lang, & Smith, an Oregon Partnership Central Analysis Bureau, a Corporation

46 F.3d 1145 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. James H. SANDERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Philip GILBERT, personally; Mitchell, Lang, & SMITH, an Oregon Partnership; Central Analysis Bureau, a corporation, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-35014. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted: Jan. 11, 1995. * Decided: Jan. 20, 1995. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HALL and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 James H. Sanders appeals pro se the district court's denial of his motion for entry of default judgment against a "John Doe" defendant. Sanders filed this action against several defendants alleging violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corruption Organizations Act ("RICO"), 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1961 , and Oregon state law. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . 1 We affirm. 3 We review a district court's denial of a motion for default judgment for an abuse of discretion. Pau v. Yosemite Park & Curry Co., 928 F.2d…