Forrest M. Sanders v. State of Montana

Good Law
46 F.3d 1145·1995 WL 40330·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 7341
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 31, 199594-35737California212 words

Opinion

Opinion

46 F.3d 1145 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Forrest M. SANDERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OF MONTANA, Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-35737. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted: Jan. 25, 1995. * Decided: Jan. 31, 1995. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HALL and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Forrest M. Sanders appeals pro se the district court's Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) dismissal of his action alleging that the State of Montana's failure to ensure that commercial vessel operators possess a federal license violates the 1971 Boating Safety Act. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's order and the magistrate's findings and recommendation, which the district court adopted in full. 3 AFFIRMED. * The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir. R. 34-4 ** This disposition is not appropriate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.