Donovan Charles Stoner v. Robert Miller Ron Angelone Sherman Hatcher Charles L. Wolff, Jr., and Charles & Jane Doe

Good Law
46 F.3d 1145·1995 WL 40361·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 7346
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 31, 199593-16408California749 words

Opinion

Opinion

46 F.3d 1145 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Donovan Charles STONER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert MILLER; Ron Angelone; Sherman Hatcher; Charles L. Wolff, Jr., and Charles & Jane Doe, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-16408. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted: Jan. 25, 1995. * Decided: Jan. 31, 1995. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HALL and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Donovan Charles Stoner, a Nevada state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his motion for preliminary injunctive relief in his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action. Stoner contends that prison officials violated his constitutional rights under the First Amendment by denying him vegetarian meals. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1292 (a)(1) and we affirm. 3 This court will reverse a district court's denial of a preliminary injunction only where the court abused its discretion or based its decision on an erroneous legal standard or on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.