Claude E. Saunders v. Director of Motor Vehicles Basuras Towing Co. Municipal Citrus Judicial District County of Los Angeles State of California California Highway Patrol

Good Law
46 F.3d 1145·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 7328
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 11, 199519-35870California490 words

Opinion

Opinion

46 F.3d 1145 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Claude E. SAUNDERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF MOTOR VEHICLES; Basuras Towing Co.; Municipal Citrus Judicial District; County of Los Angeles; State of California; California Highway Patrol, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-55267. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 19, 1994. * Decided Jan. 11, 1995. Before: SNEED, D.W. NELSON and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Claude E. Saunders appeals pro se the district court's order denying his request to proceed in forma pauperis in his action against the Director of Motor Vehicles, Basuras Towing Company, Citrus Judicial District Municipal Court, the State of California and the California Highway Patrol alleging the wrongful towing of his vehicle. The district court denied Saunders in forma pauperis status under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915 (a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We review for abuse of discretion,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.