United States v. Michael P. Bradley

46 F.3d 1146 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael P. BRADLEY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-10551. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 12, 1994. Decided Jan. 9, 1995. Before: TANG, SCHROEDER, and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Appellant Michael Bradley, a chiropractor, was indicted and convicted of ten counts of mail fraud and three counts of tax fraud. He represented himself throughout all relevant portions of the proceedings and was convicted on all counts. The principal issue on appeal is whether we must reverse because the district court did not explicitly apprise the appellant of the dangers of self-representation to ensure that Bradley made a knowing and intelligent waiver of counsel. See, e.g., Hendricks v. Zenon, 993 F.2d 664, 670 (9th Cir.1993); United States v. Balough, 820 F.2d 1485, 1487-88 (9th Cir.1987). 3 It is not disputed that the trial court…