United States v. William J. Calise
Opinion
Opinion
46 F.3d 1146 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William J. CALISE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-17120. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted: Jan. 11, 1995. * Decided: Jan. 19, 1995. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HALL and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 William Calise, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his motion for return of allegedly seized property. Calise seeks the return of several firearms and a bullet proof vest he alleges were improperly seized by the government in connection with his arrest and conviction for making, possessing, and transporting unregistered firearms. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 Calise contends that the district court erred by failing to require the government to return his property. This contention lacks merit. 4 Calise brought his motion pursuant to 21 U.S.C. Secs. 881 (b) and…