United States v. Herman Barnes, Jr.

Good Law
46 F.3d 1146·1995 WL 15701·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 7357
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 13, 199593-30267California241 words

Opinion

Opinion

46 F.3d 1146 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Herman BARNES, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-30267. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted: Dec. 19, 1994. * Decided: Jan. 13, 1995. Before: SNEED, D.W. NELSON, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Herman Barnes, Jr. appeals his sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines for his conviction, following a bench trial, for armed bank robbery, use of a firearm during a crime of violence, and being a felon in possession of a firearm. Barnes contends that the district court erred in not departing downward, because Barnes was coerced into committing the crimes. "[F]ailure to depart, when the record is silent on the issue of authority, and sentence is imposed within the applicable guideline range, is not unlawful and is not appealable on that basis." U.S. v. Garcia-Garcia, 927 F.2d 489, 491 (9th Cir. 1991). Accordingly, the district court is 3…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.