United States v. William Edgar Crowder

46 F.3d 1146 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William Edgar CROWDER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-50644. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted: Jan. 13, 1995. Decided: Jan. 27, 1995. 1 Before: CANBY and NOONAN, Circuit Judges, and KING, * District Judge 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 * William Edgar Crowder was convicted of bank fraud and submission of false statements to a bank and savings and loan institution in support of a loan application. Crowder appeals the restitution portion of his sentence on due process grounds, maintaining that the district court computed his sentence on the basis of unreliable information. We review de novo the legality of his sentence. United States v. Lujan, 936 F.2d 406, 412 (9th Cir. 1991). We affirm. II 4 A defendant challenging information used in sentencing must raise in the sentencing hearing his contention that the information is incorrect. See United…