United States v. Luene Benjamin Curry

46 F.3d 1146 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Luene Benjamin CURRY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-35518. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted: Jan. 25, 1995. * Decided: Feb. 3, 1995. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HALL and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Luene Curry appeals pro se the denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 motion. We review de novo. Grady v. United States, 929 F.2d 468, 470 (9th Cir. 1991). We have jurisdiction and affirm. 1 3 Curry was convicted of various drug charges after a bench trial on two consolidated indictments. We affirmed on direct appeal after considering Curry's pro se supplemental opening brief. United States v. Curry, Nos. 89-30221, 89-30222, unpublished memorandum (9th Cir. June 22, 1990). 4 Claims the District Court Deemed Rejected on Direct Appeal 5 We may refuse to entertain a Sec. 2255 motion that is based on claims of error which we rejected on…