United States v. Delbert Crawford

46 F.3d 1146 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Delbert CRAWFORD, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-35076. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 13, 1995. * Decided Jan. 24, 1995. 1 Before: WRIGHT and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges, and GONZALEZ ** , District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 The district court (Ryan, J.) denied Crawford's petition for relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 on the grounds that it was apparent from the face of the petition that Crawford was not entitled to relief. The district court had subject matter jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3231 . We have appellate jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and affirm. I. 4 We review the denial of Crawford's petition de novo. See Frazer v. United States, 18 F.3d 778, 781 (9th Cir.1994). We note at the onset that Crawford did not directly appeal his due process claim, which challenged the use of methamphetamine precursor chemicals supplied…