United States v. Ronald A. Jhun

46 F.3d 1147 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ronald A. JHUN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-10385. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 19, 1994. * Decided Jan. 6, 1995. Before: SNEED, D.W. NELSON, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ronald A. Jhun appeals his sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines imposed following his jury conviction of being a felon in possession of a firearm and ammunition, in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 922 (g)(1). Jhun contends that the district court erred in sentencing him as an armed career criminal under 18 U.S.C. Sec. 924 (e) and U.S.S.G. Sec. 4B1.4 because two of the predicate convictions on which the district court relied were invalid--one due to an involuntary and unknowing guilty plea, another due to an inadequate waiver of a jury trial. In Custis v. United States, 114 S.Ct. 1732 (1994), the Supreme Court held that a defendant has no right to…