United States v. John Lee Hodge, United States of America v. Gracie Lockette Johnson

Good Law
46 F.3d 1147·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 7407
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 27, 199593-10003California2,307 words

Opinion

Opinion

46 F.3d 1147 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John Lee HODGE, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gracie Lockette JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 92-10730, 93-10003. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted: Dec. 12, 1994. * Decided: Jan. 27, 1995. Before: WALLACE, Chief Circuit Judge, PREGERSON and BEEZER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 John Lee Hodge and Gracie Lockette Johnson appeal their jury convictions. Both Hodge and Johnson were convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. Secs. 2113 (a), (d) (armed bank robbery). Hodge was also convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. Sec. 924 (c)(1), use of a firearm during a crime of violence. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We affirm. 3 This case involves two distinct challenges to Hodge and Johnson's convictions. Because the facts necessary to assess each claim are distinct, we recite them…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.