United States v. Jesse Randolph Hensley

46 F.3d 1147 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jesse Randolph HENSLEY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-30148. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted: Jan. 11, 1995. Decided: Jan. 30, 1995. Before: PREGERSON and TROTT, Circuit Judges, and FITZGERALD, * District Judge. MEMORANDUM ** Jesse Randolph Hensley appeals his sentence imposed under the Sentencing Guidelines and the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA), 18 U.S.C. Sec. 924 (e), following his guilty plea conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 922 (g)(1). We have jurisdiction over this timely appeal under 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3742 and 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We affirm. I. BACKGROUND On June 6, 1993, the Salem, Oregon Police Department received an anonymous phone call stating that Hensley, who had an outstanding felony arrest warrant for a parole violation, was at a motel in Salem. Salem police went…