United States v. Robert Allen Gulsvig Francisco Vasquez Lopez, A/K/A Francisco Lopez-Vasquez

46 F.3d 1147 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Allen GULSVIG; Francisco Vasquez Lopez, a/k/a Francisco Lopez-Vasquez, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 93-30374, 93-30378. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Jan. 13, 1995. Decided Jan. 20, 1995. 1 Before: WRIGHT and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges, and GONZALEZ, * District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Gulsvig and Vasquez pleaded guilty to drug charges. Gulsvig appeals the denial of his motion to suppress evidence, arguing that the search warrant was not supported by probable cause. Vasquez appeals his sentence because the court failed to comply with the warning requirement of 21 U.S.C. Sec. 851 (b). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and affirm. A. Gulsvig 4 Gulsvig alleges that the search warrant was not supported by probable cause and that prior warrantless entries onto his curtilage and into his home tainted the later…