United States v. Nolan McSwain

Good Law
46 F.3d 1147·1995 WL 29491·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 7403
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 25, 199593-50852California869 words

Opinion

Opinion

46 F.3d 1147 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Nolan McSWAIN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-50852. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted: Jan. 9, 1995. Decided: Jan. 25, 1995. 1 Before: CANBY and NOONAN, Circuit Judges, and KING, * District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Nolan McSwain appeals his convictions for possession of cocaine with the intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. Sec. 841 (a)(1), and for conspiracy to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. Sec. 846 . We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. I. PROBABLE CAUSE 4 We review de novo the district court's decision to deny McSwain's motion to suppress. United States v. Clark, 31 F.3d 831, 834 (9th Cir.), petition for cert. filed (Dec. 5, 1994) (No. 93-30093). Contrary to McSwain's assertion, the context in which McSwain visited the Chino Hills residence shows that the magistrate had a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.