United States v. Michael J. Mastrovito

46 F.3d 1147 97 Ed. Law Rep. 1011 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael J. MASTROVITO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-16768. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 19, 1994. * Decided Jan. 6, 1995. Before: SNEED, D.W. NELSON, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Michael J. Mastrovito appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of the United States in the government's action to recover on two defaulted student loans. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We review the district court's grant of summary judgment de novo, Kruso v. International Tel. & Tel. Corp., 872 F.2d 1416 , 1421 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 937 (1990), and we affirm. 3 Mastrovito contends that the district court erred by granting summary judgment because the government's action is barred by the statute of limitations. This contention lacks merit. 4 Prior to the…