United States v. Aldo Garcia-Soberanis

Good Law
46 F.3d 1147·1995 WL 40288·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 7405
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 27, 199593-50773California960 words

Opinion

Opinion

46 F.3d 1147 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Aldo GARCIA-SOBERANIS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-50773. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted: Jan. 13, 1995. Decided: Jan. 27, 1995. 1 Before: CANBY and NOONAN, Circuit Judges, and KING, * District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Aldo Garcia-Soberanis appeals his convictions for importing cocaine and marijuana, possessing cocaine and marijuana with the intent to distribute, conspiring to import cocaine and marijuana, and conspiracy to possess cocaine and marijuana with the intent to distribute, in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2 , and 21 U.S.C. Secs. 841 (a)(1), 846, 952, 960, and 963. Garcia contends that the evidence is insufficient to sustain his convictions. 4 Because Garcia did not move for a judgment of acquittal, we review the sufficiency of the evidence only "to prevent a manifest miscarriage of justice or for plain error." United…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.