United States v. Ralfiki Lamar Johnson

Good Law
46 F.3d 1147·1995 WL 23658·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 7395
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 20, 199594-50135California1,227 words

Opinion

Opinion

46 F.3d 1147 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ralfiki Lamar JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-50135. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted: Jan. 11, 1995. * Decided: Jan. 20, 1995. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HALL and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ralfiki Lamar Johnson appeals his conviction and 30-month sentence following entry of a guilty plea to conspiracy to interfere with commerce by robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. Secs. 371 , 1951. 3 Counsel for Johnson filed a motion to withdraw and a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), which identified five issues for review: (1) whether Johnson's guilty plea was involuntary; (2) whether the district court erred by imposing a sentence at the high end of the applicable sentencing range; (3) whether the district court erred by imposing an upward adjustment based on the amount of loss involved in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.