United States v. Daniel Hartog

46 F.3d 1147 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daniel HARTOG, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-10441. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 13, 1995. * Decided Jan. 20, 1995. Before: ALDISERT, ** CHOY, and SCHROEDER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM *** 2 Daniel Hartog appeals his guilty plea and sentence for aiding and abetting the importation of in excess of 1,100 kilograms of marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. Sec. 952 (a). On February 26, 1993, Hartog signed a plea agreement providing for, inter alia, a non-parolable 15-year sentence pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 11(e)(1)(C). He urges on appeal that the district court erred in denying his motion, based on claims of outrageous government conduct, to dismiss his indictment or suppress evidence. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We affirm his conviction and sentence. A. 3 Pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 11(a)(2), a defendant may…