United States v. Oscar A. Iniego

46 F.3d 1147 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Oscar A. INIEGO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-10265. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted: Jan. 11, 1995. * Decided: Jan. 20, 1995. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HALL and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Oscar A. Iniego appeals his 135-month sentence imposed following a guilty plea to one count of conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute a controlled substance and one count of possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance and aiding and abetting. Iniego contends that the district court erred in finding that he was an organizer or leader of the criminal activity under U.S.S.G. Sec. 3B1.1(a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and affirm. 3 We review for clear error a district court's factual finding of the defendant's leadership role in the offense. United States v. Leung, 35 F.3d…