United States v. Narcizo Ernest Reaza

46 F.3d 1148 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Narcizo Ernest REAZA, Defendant-Appellant. No. CA 94-50073. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted: Jan. 12, 1995. Decided: Jan. 30, 1995. 1 Before: CANBY and NOONAN, Circuit Judges and KING, District Judge * . 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Narcizo Ernest Reaza, a former Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department Deputy, appeals his conviction of various tax and bank fraud offenses. He challenges the district court's denial of his motion to suppress statements he made during a number of interviews with Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department officers. He also contends that the district court should have held a Kastigar hearing, and also that it should have dismissed the indictment. We affirm the judgment of the district court. II. 4 We uphold the district court's finding that the interviews in which Reaza participated were not part of an…