United States v. Rafael Salas-Vasquez, United States of America v. Cesar Rodriguez Vasquez

46 F.3d 1148 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rafael SALAS-VASQUEZ, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cesar RODRIGUEZ VASQUEZ, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 94-50239, 94-50243. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 11, 1995. * Decided Jan. 23, 1995. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HALL and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 In these consolidated cases, Cesar Rodriguez Vasquez and Rafael Salas-Vasquez appeal their convictions, which followed conditional pleas of guilty to possession of false identification documents in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1028 (a)(3). Appellants claim the district court denied them due process by ruling on their suppression motion without viewing a photograph the government had attached to its opposition. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 We review de novo the district court's determination…