United States v. Charles Keith Shockey, A/K/A Charles Keith Mayfield

Good Law
46 F.3d 1148·1995 WL 23619·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 7425
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 20, 199594-30168California854 words

Opinion

Opinion

46 F.3d 1148 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles Keith SHOCKEY, a/k/a Charles Keith Mayfield, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-30168. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted: Jan. 11, 1995. * Decided: Jan. 20, 1995. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HALL and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. MEMORANDUM ** Charles Keith Shockey appeals his ninety-two month sentence imposed following the entry of a guilty plea to possession of an unregistered destructive device, in violation of 26 U.S.C. Secs. 5841 , 5845(a) and (f), 5861(d), and 5871. Shockey contends that the district court: (1) improperly enhanced his sentence for obstruction of justice pursuant to U.S.S.G. Sec. 3C1.1, and (2) erred in failing to reduce his sentence for acceptance of responsibility pursuant to U.S.S.G. Sec. 3E1.1. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and affirm. Shockey contends that the district court's enhancement for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.