United States v. Ernesto Ramirez-Davilla

46 F.3d 1148 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ernesto RAMIREZ-DAVILLA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-16455. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Jan. 10, 1995. Decided Feb. 2, 1995. 1 Before: GOODWIN and SCHROEDER, Circuit Judges, and TASHIMA, * District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Ernesto Ramirez-Davilla appeals the denial of his petition for writ of coram nobis. In 1992, Ramirez-Davilla pleaded guilty to entering the United States at a place other than that designated by immigration officials, in violation of 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1325 (a)(1). He filed this petition in 1993 contending that his plea was invalid due to ineffective assistance of counsel. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We review de novo the denial of a petition for a writ of coram nobis, United States v. Walgren, 885 F.2d 1417, 1420 (9th Cir.1989), and we affirm. 4 Ramirez-Davilla was a lawful permanent…