United States v. Danny Glenn Wallace

Good Law
46 F.3d 1148·1995 WL 37340·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 7433
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 30, 199594-30314California741 words

Opinion

Opinion

46 F.3d 1148 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Danny Glenn WALLACE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-30314. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted: Jan. 25, 1995. * Decided: Jan. 30, 1995. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HALL and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Danny Glenn Wallace appeals his sentence of thirty months imposed following a guilty plea to being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 922 (g)(1). Wallace contends the district court erred by granting a four-level upward adjustment to his base offense level because he possessed the firearm in connection with another felony. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We affirm. 3 The district court's determination that the defendant possessed the firearm in connection with another felony is a factual finding we review for clear error. See United States v. Routon, 25 F.3d 815, 819 (9th Cir.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.