United States v. Lester Murray Van Blericom

Good Law
46 F.3d 1148·1995 WL 23615·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 7426
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 20, 199594-30188California1,822 words

Opinion

Opinion

46 F.3d 1148 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lester Murray VAN BLERICOM, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-30188. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted: Jan. 11, 1995. * Decided: Jan. 20, 1995. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HALL and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 After making a conditional guilty plea, Lester Van Blericom appeals his conviction for possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. Sec. 841 (a)(1) and being a convicted felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 922 (g)(1). Van Blericom contends the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence. He also contends the district court erred when it refused to hold a Franks hearing. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 On February 17, 1992, explosives were stolen from a storage magazine on the Fredrickson Road construction…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.