Maria Irma Belinda Lugue Vergara v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Good Law
46 F.3d 1148·1995 WL 7945·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 7420
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 9, 199593-70468California739 words

Opinion

Opinion

46 F.3d 1148 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Maria Irma Belinda Lugue VERGARA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 93-70468. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 16, 1994. Decided Jan. 9, 1995. Before: HUG, CANBY and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 The immigration judge denied petitioner the opportunity to depart voluntarily because of her use of fraud to violate the immigration laws. She appealed to the BIA, then to this court. We affirmed. Vergara v. INS, 91-70521, 1993 WL 385494 (9th Cir.1993) (unpublished disposition). 3 After the BIA denied her appeal, Ms. Vergara moved to reopen. She sought to apply for suspension of deportation. The Board denied that motion in May 1993. The denial of the motion to reopen is all we have before us. We are compelled to affirm, because of the BIA's broad discretion, and our narrow scope of review, for denials of motions to reopen.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.