Victoria C. v. Cincinnati Bengals, Inc.

Good Law
46 F.3d 1148·1994 WL 727752·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 40470
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 5, 199493-35595California4,613 words

Opinion

Opinion

46 F.3d 1148 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. VICTORIA C., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CINCINNATI BENGALS, INC., Eric Ball, Professional Football Player; Leo Barker, Professional Football Player; Lewis Billups, Professional Football Player, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-35595. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 4, 1994. Decided Dec. 5, 1994. Before: ALARCON, BEEZER and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Victoria Crytzer appeals from a judgment entered pursuant to Rule 54(b), Fed.R.Civ.Pro. 54(b), upon a jury verdict in favor of the Cincinnati Bengals, Inc., and certain members of that football team ("the Bengals"), upholding the validity of a release of her claims against the defendants. Crytzer's action for personal injury damages and rescission of the release arises from alleged multiple rapes on October 3, 1990, by fourteen members of the Cincinnati Bengals professional football team. 3 Crytzer contends…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.