United States v. Mor Rodriguez-Zamora

46 F.3d 1148 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mor RODRIGUEZ-ZAMORA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-30389. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted: Nov. 4, 1993. Decided: Feb. 3, 1995. 1 Before: REINHARDT, BRUNETTI, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges 2 MEMORANDUM * 3 Appellant Mor Rodriguez-Zamora appeals his conviction and sentence for conspiracy to possess and distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. Secs. 841 (a)(1) and 846. We affirm the district court. Sufficiency of the Evidence 4 Rodriguez-Zamora challenges the sufficiency of the evidence used to convict him of conspiracy to possess and distribute cocaine. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the government, Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319 (1979), we agree with the district court that the prosecution presented sufficient evidence to sustain the jury's verdict. Ineffective Assistance of Counsel 5…