United States v. Carlos Santos Perez-Estrada
Opinion
Opinion
46 F.3d 1148 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carlos Santos PEREZ-ESTRADA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-50378. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 18, 1994. * Filed July 21, 1994. Withdrawn Nov. 4, 1994. Decided Nov. 4, 1994. Before: FARRIS, KOZINSKI, and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 The memorandum filed July 21, 1994 is ordered withdrawn. The attached memorandum is ordered filed. 2 The panel has voted to deny appellant's petition for rehearing and to reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc. 3 The full court has been advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc and no active judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed.R.App.P. 35. 4 The petition for rehearing is denied and the suggestion for rehearing en banc is rejected. 5 MEMORANDUM ** 6 Carlos Santos Perez-Estrada appeals his conviction, following a bench trial, and his 52-month sentence for…