Randal N. Wiideman v. Albert Peralta

Good Law
46 F.3d 1149·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 7447
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 6, 199519-17196California683 words

Opinion

Opinion

46 F.3d 1149 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Randal N. WIIDEMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Albert PERALTA, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-16595. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 19, 1994. * Decided Jan. 6, 1995. Before: SNEED, D.W. NELSON, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Nevada state prisoner Randal N. Wiideman appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment for Albert Peralta, Chief of Inmate Services for the Nevada Department of Prisons ("NDP"). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We review the district court's grant of summary judgment de novo, Kruso v. International Tel. & Tel. Corp., 872 F.2d 1416 , 1421 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 937 (1990), and we affirm. 3 Wiideman brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 alleging that Peralta violated his Fourteenth Amendment rights by refusing to comply with the permanent injunction issued in Wiideman v. Angelone,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.