Dan Willbanks v. Jim Crotts John Keck Calvin Allred James Riley Francis Ranaccelli

46 F.3d 1149 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Dan WILLBANKS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jim CROTTS; John Keck; Calvin Allred; James Riley; Francis Ranaccelli, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-16098. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 19, 1994. * Decided Jan. 6, 1995. Before: SNEED, D.W. NELSON, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Dan Willbanks appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his action against Judge Riley, an Arizona Superior Court Judge, Frances Ranaccelli, an employee of the court clerk's office, and several private parties. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 Willbanks brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 alleging that defendants conspired to violated his constitutional rights in relation to several state tort actions filed in Cochise County Superior Court. The district court dismissed Willbanks's claims against Judge Riley and Ranaccelli on the ground that…