Westfield Insurance Company Ohio Farmers Insurance Company v. Charles S. Pashayan, Sr. Lilly A. Pashayan Ace Service, Inc.

46 F.3d 1149 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. WESTFIELD INSURANCE COMPANY; Ohio Farmers Insurance Company, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Charles S. PASHAYAN, Sr.; Lilly A. Pashayan; Ace Service, Inc., Defendants-Appellants. No. 93-16310. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 16, 1994. * Decided Jan. 9, 1995. Before: HUG, CANBY and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Charles and Lilly Pashayan appeal a district court order holding that Westfield Insurance Company was not obliged to indemnify the Pashayans for the costs of investigation and cleanup of the "Ace site." The Pashayans argue that the district court erred in reaching this conclusion, and that the district court further erred in ruling that, according to the terms of a collateral agreement between the Pashayans and Westfield, the Pashayans had to reimburse Westfield within sixty days from entry of the district court's order. We affirm. I. 3 We have held that, under…