Araya Wolde-Giorgis, Dr. v. Arizona Department of Transportation, and State of Arizona

46 F.3d 1149 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Araya WOLDE-GIORGIS, Dr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, and State of Arizona, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-15665. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 19, 1994. * Decided Jan. 10, 1995. Before: SNEED, D.W. NELSON, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Dr. Araya Wolde-Giorgis appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of Wolde-Giorgis's action against the Arizona Department of Transportation ("ADOT") alleging age discrimination in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act ("ADEA"), 29 U.S.C. Secs. 621-635 , and race and national origin discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. Secs. 2000e-2000(h). Wolde-Giorgis's claims arose out of the ADOT's decision not to interview him for a position of employment. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 * ADEA Claim 4 The district…