Jerrell Woolridge v. Larry F. Taylor, Warden

Good Law
46 F.3d 1149·1995 WL 25129·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 7455
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 23, 199594-55543California911 words

Opinion

Opinion

46 F.3d 1149 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jerrell WOOLRIDGE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Larry F. TAYLOR, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. No. 94-55543. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 11, 1995. * Decided Jan. 23, 1995. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HALL and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jerrell Woolridge appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 petition. 1 Woolridge contends that: (1) the district court denied his right to present a defense; (2) the district court coerced him into withdrawing a motion to withdraw his guilty plea; (3) the district court should have corrected the presentence report (PSR); (4) the district court lacked jurisdiction to sentence him; (5) he is entitled to credit for time served "in Boron Federal Prison Camp, or any other place of confinement;" and (6) he should have been enlarged on bail pending appeal. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 . We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.