United States v. Walter F. Jekot, M.D.

Good Law
47 F.3d 1176
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 7, 199593-50700California1,047 words

Opinion

Opinion

47 F.3d 1176 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Walter F. JEKOT, M.D., Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-50700. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 7, 1994. Decided Feb. 24, 1995. As Amended on Denial of Rehearing and Rejection of Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc April 7, 1995. Before: SCHROEDER, FLETCHER and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Walter F. Jekot appeals his sentence following his guilty plea to one count of conspiracy to obtain and distribute anabolic steroids and human growth hormone (HGH). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 The district court granted an evidentiary hearing on three contested issues, but denied Jekot's request for a hearing on all other contested issues. Reviewing for an abuse of discretion, United States v. Baker, 894 F.2d 1083 (9th Cir.1990), we agree with the district court's conclusion that an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.