United States v. Harold Joseph Bradley

47 F.3d 1176 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Harold Joseph BRADLEY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-10419. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 15, 1995. * Decided Feb. 24, 1995. Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Harold Joseph Bradley appeals his conviction by conditional guilty plea to possession of an unregistered firearm in violation of 26 U.S.C. Sec. 5861 (d). Bradley contends the district court erred when it ruled that reasonable suspicion existed for a parole search of his residence even though the parole agent relied on information from a person with a history of mental illness. A district court's ruling on a motion to suppress is reviewed de novo; its findings of fact are reviewed for clear error. United States v. Huffhines, 967 F.2d 314, 316 (9th Cir.1992). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and we affirm. 3 A parole search…